<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The BCS gets what it pays&nbsp;for.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a working theory that if the BCS does in fact go down one day, we&#8217;ll be able to trace its demise to the <a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/bcs-hires-ari-fleischer-to-improve-image.php">hiring of Ari Fleischer</a>.  I mean, here&#8217;s a guy who&#8217;s probably <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2097761/">the most disliked White House press secretary</a> since Ron Ziegler and who&#8217;s associated with the political party currently out of power during a period when the BCS powers-that-be have grown concerned about political pressure for a D-1 football playoff.  All in all, it&#8217;s a remarkably tone deaf decision, one that could wind up ranking with rolling out the Edsel.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s good to see that Fleischer is already living down to my expectations.</p>
<p>Take <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125997028114077435.html">this <em>Wall Street Journal</em> piece</a> that popped up last week.  It got <a href="http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/BCS-next-hour-of-Congressional-reckoning-could-?urn=ncaaf,206911">some Internet chatter</a> over Rep. Barton&#8217;s meaningless playoff bill possibly coming up for Congressional consideration, but nobody seems to have latched onto this quote of Fleischer&#8217;s that appeared near the article&#8217;s end:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The more he dug into it – the more he realized the BCS is a moneymaking cartel,&#8221; said a spokesman for Mr. Barton, Sean Brown.</p>
<p>The reality of the BCS is &#8220;just the opposite,&#8221; a BCS spokesman, Ari Fleischer, responded. &#8220;<strong>There is more money to be made if we had a playoff</strong>, but the price would be a diminished regular season and the end of the bowls as we know them.&#8221; <em>[Emphasis added.]</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Taken as a whole, that is a lot of bovine fecal matter crammed into one sentence.  Look, I&#8217;m as anti-extended playoffs as anyone I know, but even I&#8217;m willing to concede that there are playoff formats that could be judiciously designed that wouldn&#8217;t negatively affect the regular season or the bowls.</p>
<p>But the kicker is his &#8220;more money&#8221; comment.  Either Ari is talking completely out of his derriere when he says that &#8211; no great surprise there &#8211; or he&#8217;s just conceded that his masters are full of it when they engage in their hand-wringing exercise over not killing the golden goose of college football&#8217;s revenue stream.  Given that it&#8217;s Fleischer, I&#8217;d bet on the former, but in any event he&#8217;s given playoff proponents a wonderful club with which to bludgeon the BCS brass.  If nothing else, he should make for an entertaining witness at the next Congressional hearing.  Even Joe Barton&#8217;s not dumb enough to miss on that one.</p>
]]></html></oembed>