<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[We keep saying it.  You just won&#8217;t&nbsp;listen.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://bravesandbirds.blogspot.com/2010/12/few-follow-up-thoughts-on-falcons-post.html" target="_blank">Michael Elkon</a> today:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; One argument in favor of the way that championships are awarded in  college football: the two best teams of the past decade were the &#8217;01  Rams and the &#8217;07 Patriots and neither team won the Super Bowl.  In both  instances, those teams lost the Super Bowl to opponents with  demonstrably inferior records<em> whom the &#8217;01 Rams and &#8217;07 Pats had beaten on the road during the regular season</em>.   It strains the meaning of &#8220;champion&#8221; to assign that title to the &#8217;01  Patriots and &#8217;07 Giants.  I remain in favor of a small college football  playoff; four teams would be good, six teams would be very good, and  eight teams would be OK. However, we shouldn&#8217;t ignore the fact that the absence of the playoff  reset button in college football is a good thing in a significant way.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>