<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Target this.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>The NCAA has officially approved the new ejection for targeting rule.  <a href="http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/07/ejection-for-targeting-approved-will-go-into-effect-in-2013/" target="_blank">Therein lies the rub</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>One area of concern, though, is how exactly to define the targeting of a defenseless player and how different officiating crews may interpret <a href="http://www.eaifo2.org/files_pdf/2012_Targeting_Guidelines.pdf">the NCAA’s own definition</a>.  In an attempt to alleviate some concern on that front, the oversight panel accepted the rules committee proposal that any targeting penalty be subject to immediate video review.  The release states that “[t]he replay official must have conclusive evidence that a player should not be ejected to overturn the call on the field,” which of course brings additional subjectivity into the mix.</p></blockquote>
<p>A bug for some, a feature for Penn Wagers.</p>
]]></html></oembed>