<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[In the SEC, cousins can be&nbsp;tricky.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2013/03/15/sec-commissioner-talks-tournament-expansion-cable-channel/1991881/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+UsatodaycomCollegeSports-TopStories+%28Sports+-+College+-+Top+Stories%29" target="_blank">this</a> observation from Mike Slive means:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Q: Along those lines, is the SEC going to stick with 14 members or is further expansion anywhere on the horizon?</b></p>
<p><b>A:</b> In some ways 12 is ideal but at least 14 is sort of a cousin of 12. Sixteen is a distant relative. We&#8217;re actually still in the process of absorbing both of these schools into our scheduling, particularly on the football side. It&#8217;s hard to absorb one, let alone two.</p></blockquote>
<p>Whut?</p>
<p>Now I understand why we can&#8217;t have a nine-game conference schedule.  They&#8217;re having too much trouble sorting out the family tree.</p>
]]></html></oembed>