<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Give &#8217;em credit for&nbsp;consistency.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kentucky.com/2013/05/06/2629934/mark-story-barnhart-says-kentucky.html" target="_blank">Kentucky</a> opposes going to a nine-game conference schedule now, just like the school opposed going to an eight-game schedule in 1992.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to kick a cupcake addiction.  Although the AD claims to have something else on his mind.</p>
<blockquote><p>Going to nine SEC games a year would make it more challenging for UK to get enough wins (six) to become bowl eligible. Barnhart says the physical impact on Kentucky&#8217;s players also factors into his stance.</p>
<p>&#8220;History says it&#8217;s very difficult for us to have the level of depth, the second, third, fourth lines of players, that some of the other schools in our league have just as a means of their in-state recruiting situations,&#8221; Barnhart said. &#8220;When we have to play a long line of league games, it&#8217;s a grind, our teams can get beaten up physically. It&#8217;s better for us, for our players, when the schedule allows us to have some so-called breathers, so that our kids can sort of restore themselves physically in-season.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s how you inspire confidence in your football program.</p>
<p>Oh, and here&#8217;s your bonus chuckle:</p>
<blockquote><p>Still, strictly from a position of UK&#8217;s self interest, Barnhart is right to oppose the ninth SEC football game. If they are smart, the administrations at schools such as Mississippi, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt, Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee <strong>and even South Carolina</strong> will fight it, too.  <em>[Emphasis added.]</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Looks like they&#8217;ve still got a public perception problem in Columbia.</p>
]]></html></oembed>