<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Is the BCS a victim of its own&nbsp;success?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2013/12/death_to_the_bcs_is_upon_colle.html" target="_blank">a very good piece</a> about the national title format that&#8217;s about to bite the dust, Roy Kramer offers something of an early obituary.</p>
<blockquote><p>Kramer can&#8217;t help but wonder: If Oklahoma State had not been upset by Iowa State in 2011 to help create an All-SEC championship game, would the BCS still be alive?</p>
<p>&#8220;Deep down,&#8221; Kramer said, &#8220;I always thought the more logical way would be to take the three highest-rated conference champions and a wild card.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That actually makes more sense to me than the selection committee does, but I suppose the new format has the virtue of giving the big conference commissioners more control over the selection process.</p>
<p>As for Kramer&#8217;s question, I think all the absence of a rematch would have accomplished would have been to postpone the inevitable.  Between the greed and the freakout over the recent decline in viewership, the jump to a four-team playoff was coming no matter what Oklahoma State did.</p>
]]></html></oembed>