<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Easier said than&nbsp;done.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/93406/3-point-stance-state-of-the-union" target="_blank">Ivan Maisel</a> neatly summarizes how we got to pondering the possibility of a college players union:</p>
<blockquote><p>Regardless of which side you come down upon in the debate over whether student-athletes should be allowed to unionize, there’s no question that the NCAA and its member schools brought this upon themselves. They have dismissed the student-athletes’ concerns, if they ever listened. The industry needs to find an answer beyond “Shut up and look how much we’re spending on you.” That isn’t working.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sadly, <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/college-football/news/20140129/northwestern-players-union-mailbag/" target="_blank">they think it is</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>But then I attended the NCAA convention earlier this month, where Duke lacrosse player Maddie Salamone &#8212; representing the organization&#8217;s largely ceremonial Student-Athlete Advisory Committee &#8212; got up in front of 800 Division I administrators and lamented, &#8220;The student-athlete voice is not as meaningful as we have been led to believe in the past.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>You would think at some point that somebody with a modicum of common sense would urge his or her peers to pull their collective heads out of their asses.  But this is the NCAA we&#8217;re talking about, so that&#8217;s still something of a pipe dream.</p>
]]></html></oembed>