<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[More fuel for the&nbsp;fire]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Hey, the 10-second substitution proposal has already exposed one fault line among football coaches, <a href="http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10574135/stanford-cardinals-coach-david-shaw-strongly-opposed-early-signing-day" target="_blank">so what&#8217;s another NCAA rule that might stir some bad blood</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>If the NCAA moves forward with an early signing period in college football, it will be staunchly opposed by Stanford coach David Shaw.</p>
<p>&#8220;I might be alone in this, I think it&#8217;s terrible,&#8221; Shaw said following the Cardinal&#8217;s spring practice Saturday. &#8220;I think it&#8217;s terrible. The reason [for an early signing period], in my opinion, is coaches don&#8217;t like when kids commit and switch late.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; &#8220;On top of that &#8212; and I&#8217;ll be honest here, which is rare for a football coach in a setting like this &#8212; but we have a lot of kids that don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re going to get into school until after that early signing day,&#8221; Shaw said. &#8220;So we&#8217;re going to punish the academic schools just because coaches don&#8217;t want a kid to switch their commitment?</p>
<p>&#8220;People can make whatever argument they want, it boils down to that. &#8230; Coaches don&#8217;t want to keep recruiting an entire class all year.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>If I didn&#8217;t know any better, I&#8217;d think there was a divide and conquer strategy in play here, except I don&#8217;t think the NCAA is devious enough to pull something like that off and I have no idea what&#8217;s to be gained by it in any event.  Still, I figure we&#8217;re one lobbying the Conference Commissioners Association story away from things getting really personal.  Again.</p>
]]></html></oembed>