<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Sympathy for the&nbsp;devil]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>See if you can spot the straw man Chris Low builds to better his argument that <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/93998/fast-lane-wont-be-too-fast-for-saban" target="_blank">Nick Saban Will Survive, By Damn</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>So regardless of what Saban’s agenda is or isn’t, saying he’s trying to create a competitive advantage for his defense through a rules change is a stretch.</p>
<p>The competitive advantage he has created goes back to the way he has recruited and developed players.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s saying Saban&#8217;s trying to <em>create</em> a competitive advantage with the 10-second substitution rule proposal.  He&#8217;s simply trying to keep the one he&#8217;s already got &#8211; you know, the one Low references in his second sentence.  Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that.</p>
<p>But the reality is that Saban&#8217;s advantage is hard to construct and expensive to maintain, which is why it&#8217;s one that few programs can match.  While that makes it worthy of a strong defense on Saban&#8217;s part, it also makes it harder to support if others lacking in Alabama&#8217;s resources are able to level the playing field on any given Saturday with greater strategic creativity.</p>
]]></html></oembed>