<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[What&#8217;s in a&nbsp;name?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office blows off somebody who sought to cash in on Johnny Manziel&#8217;s popularity by attempting to register <a href="http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10645404/johnny-manziel-one-step-closer-johnny-football-trademark" target="_blank">the &#8220;Johnny Football&#8221; trademark first</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Registration is refused because the applied-for mark consists of or includes a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular living individual whose written consent to register the mark is not of record,&#8221; the examining attorney wrote. To make the case, the attorney attached articles that referred to Manziel as &#8220;Johnny Football.&#8221;</p>
<p>The investment firm, based in College Station, Texas, filed for the trademark on Nov. 1, 2012, as Manziel rose to prominence in the town, and throughout the country, as Texas A&amp;M&#8217;s star quarterback. Manziel&#8217;s organization, JMAN2 Enterprises, filed for the trademark three months later.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shockingly, the role Texas A&amp;M played in the rise of Manziel&#8217;s market value played no part in the deliberations.  Maybe the NCAA should sue for a share of the royalties.</p>
<p>Seriously, is there a better example of the sketchy limits of the amateurism standard than this?</p>
]]></html></oembed>