<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[More cowbell, please.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s no secret <a href="http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2015/01/26/Events-and-Attractions/CFP.aspx" target="_blank">ESPN wants</a> the CFP to move the semifinals off New Year&#8217;s Eve to a more broadcast friendly January 2, and that the CFP folks are resisting the push.</p>
<p>So what happens if ESPN is correct in its concern about the ratings?  I mean, <a href="http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2015-01-26/college-football-playoff-schedule-ratings-espn" target="_blank">it&#8217;s not just the date that may be an issue</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Of course, even if the semifinals were to move to Jan. 2 — or somehow stay on New Year’s Day — the numbers would be hard pressed to match last year. The Rose Bowl (14.8, 28.2M) and Sugar (15.2, 28.3M) bowls <a href="http://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2015/01/college-football-playoff-ratings-sugar-rose-most-watched-cable-programs-ever-oregon-ohio-state-alabama-fsu/" target="_blank"> were the highest-rated and most-watched college football games since 2010</a>, topping the previous four BCS championship games. A confluence of factors led the strong numbers, including the novelty of the playoffs and the high-profile nature of participants Alabama, Florida State, Ohio State and Oregon. Those will be difficult to replicate next season, regardless of the schedule.</p></blockquote>
<p>I expect the &#8220;high-profile nature&#8221; of those games to repeat &#8211; that&#8217;s kind of the whole point to the structure of the CFP &#8211;  but the novelty issue is obviously a different story.  At some point the same people who felt the need to juice up college football&#8217;s postseason from the BCS to the CFP will get the shakes again, and then what?  They&#8217;ll probably give in to the WWL on no longer competing with the ball dropping on Times Square (and why not, since this is about garnering a more broad-based national audience, anyway), but when even that doesn&#8217;t fix things, they&#8217;ll have little choice but to choose to take the next step.</p>
<p>When you&#8217;ve got postseason fever, there&#8217;s only one cure.</p>
]]></html></oembed>