<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[They do it because they&nbsp;can.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s a story that sums up all of the arrogance that I despise from college athletics administrators, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/why-students-foot-the-bill-for-college-sports-and-how-some-are-fighting-back/2015/11/30/7ca47476-8d3e-11e5-ae1f-af46b7df8483_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_ncaa-fees-315pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory" target="_blank">this is it</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>About 1,000 miles to the west in Lawrence, a battle to eliminate a student fee at the University of Kansas ended differently.</p>
<p>In two years as a walk-on golfer, Catt got an inside view of Kansas athletics and began to wonder why the department needed $50 from each student every year in addition to ticket payments.</p>
<p>In two years, Kansas athletics spent $9 million in severance on fired football coaches Mark Mangino and Turner Gill. When Catt did not notice any corresponding layoffs or cutbacks, he decided to do some research.</p>
<p>Catt reviewed financial statements that showed Kansas athletics income rose from $50.8 million in 2005 to $93.6 million in 2013. In early 2014, Catt sent a 35-page report to the student senate, arguing that the fee, which produced about $1.1 million for athletics, should be eliminated.</p>
<p>“Students were seeing a rise in tuition, more student debt . . . and the athletics department was making more and more money every year. It just didn’t seem like they needed it,” Catt said in an interview.</p>
<p>Catt’s report was persuasive. Students voted to kill the fee. Athletics administrators fought back, though, and eventually won a compromise from the chancellor that kept a reduced $12 fee. Ultimately, the change cost Kansas athletics about $350,000.</p>
<p>Kansas athletics administrators weren’t satisfied. A few months later, they eliminated one of the best student sections at men’s basketball games — 120 seats right behind the Jayhawks’ bench — and gave the seats to donors who contributed at least $25,000 per year.</p>
<p>“When the student government proposed [eliminating the fee] . . . it made it very clear that it wanted the athletic department to find other ways to raise revenue,” Kansas athletics spokesman Jim Marchiony told a local newspaper. “That’s what we did.”</p>
<p>When Catt talks about the experience today, one comment from a deputy athletics director sticks out in his mind.</p>
<p>“He told me, ‘We’re in the business of being great, and it costs money to be great,’ ” Catt recalled.</p>
<p>A few months later, Kansas fired football coach Charlie Weis, who won just six of 28 games at the school, taking on another $5 million in severance.</p>
<p>“It became clear in our meetings,” Catt said, “that normal economics don’t apply to anyone in Kansas athletics.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Honestly, were I a Kansas student, the thought that part of my student loans went to pay Charlie Weis&#8217; buyout would drive me to drink.  Heavily.</p>
]]></html></oembed>