<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[S&amp;P+ look at Georgia&#8217;s 2019&nbsp;schedule]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Inspired by <a href="https://www.rollbamaroll.com/2019/2/15/18226012/s-p-breakdown-of-alabama-footballs-conference-schedule?utm_campaign=rollbamaroll&amp;utm_content=chorus&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this exercise</a> at <em>Roll &#8216;Bama Roll</em>, I thought I&#8217;d break down Georgia&#8217;s schedule on the basis of <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2019/2/11/18219163/2019-college-football-rankings-projections" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bill Connelly&#8217;s just-released S&amp;P+ preseason rankings</a>.  Here&#8217;s what you get:</p>
<ul>
<li>@ Vanderbilt 53</li>
<li>Murray State [FCS]</li>
<li>Arkansas State 70</li>
<li>Notre Dame 12</li>
<li>@ Tennessee 21</li>
<li>South Carolina 18</li>
<li>Kentucky 37</li>
<li>v. Florida 6</li>
<li>Missouri 16</li>
<li>@ Auburn 8</li>
<li>Texas A&amp;M 13</li>
<li>@ Georgia Tech 89</li>
</ul>
<p>That works out to an average ranking of 31.18.  Alabama&#8217;s schedule averages out to 38, if you&#8217;re wondering.  (The difference is largely driven by the teams&#8217; non-conference scheduling.  They do share four common opponents &#8211; Tennessee, South Carolina, Auburn and TAMU.)</p>
<p>On paper, that is no walk in the park, particularly with regard to the lengthy stretch between the Arkansas State and Georgia Tech <em>**snicker**</em> games.  Average ranking for those eight games?  16.38.  That&#8217;s a pretty stern gauntlet to run.  Kirby&#8217;s got his work cut out for him.</p>
]]></html></oembed>