<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A speculative look at Georgia&#8217;s 2020&nbsp;schedule]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Dean Legge does that <a href="https://dawgpost.com/s/1102/2020-uga-football-schedule-filling-in-the-blanks" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.  It strikes me as a fairly reasonable exercise.  The biggest question for now appears to be when the South Carolina and Vanderbilt games are scheduled.  A few observations:</p>
<ul>
<li>I would assume that South Carolina would scream bloody murder at being forced to play Georgia and Clemson in back-to-back weeks, so here&#8217;s my vote for the &#8216;Dores being the Dawgs&#8217; penultimate opponent.</li>
<li>They&#8217;re going to wind up playing Alabama and Auburn within a three-week period.  In other words, Georgia is being handed the exact situation Auburn demanded be changed for itself.</li>
<li>Tennessee and Vanderbilt are going to wind up remaining back-to-back games, just in November.</li>
<li>Legge says that the quid pro quo for playing Auburn on the road in 2012 and 2013 was indeed securing the bye week before Florida&#8230; which begs the question of what Florida threw in the pot with the conference when it secured the same privilege.</li>
</ul>
<p>What are y&#8217;all&#8217;s thoughts about this?</p>
]]></html></oembed>