<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Change with the changing&nbsp;times]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Following up on that last post, <a href="http://sportstreatise.com/2020/05/whats-next-in-the-spread-era-part-i-differentiation/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ian Boyd</a> asks the exact same question that popped into my head when I read that Manny Diaz quote from Connelly.</p>
<blockquote><p>Within Connelly’s article is a point made by Manny Diaz, current head coach of the Miami Hurricanes.</p>
<p style="padding-left:40px;">“There’s such a thing as a ‘college football offense’: 90% of America runs 60% of the same plays.”</p>
<p style="padding-left:40px;"><cite>–<a href="https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/29124560/how-spread-offense-conquered-college-football-hal-mumme-joe-burrow">Manny Diaz to Bill Connelly</a></cite></p>
<p>This point, clearly true when you study some playbooks, leads to a follow up question. What differentiates teams anymore? Does this turn the college football world that was once a tapestry of disparate tactics and styles into a monochromatic product? How in the world can the less-advantaged teams compete if everyone is doing the same thing?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, &#8220;compete&#8221; is doing some heavy lifting there.  No, a school isn&#8217;t going to be able to run the triple option and compete for a national championship.  But there&#8217;s still a niche for, say, Mississippi State to run the Air Raid and make itself a consistent pain in the ass that occasionally rises to the heights of nine or ten wins in a brutally tough division.</p>
<p>The real takeaway, though, is that if Diaz is right and Boyd is right, then running a program that makes its bones on talent accumulation &#8212; hint, hint, Kirby &#8212; means you ought to be doing what other elite programs are doing, because the difference at that point <em>becomes the talent level &#8212;</em> especially on the defensive side of the ball, if you&#8217;ve got the kids who are better at stopping what those other offenses are doing.</p>
<p>I used to argue that there was real value to being a contrarian in college football scheming, that in an era when defenses are geared to stop the spread attack, being the team that sticks to a power run game has its advantages.  The problem with that philosophy these days is spread offenses have gotten so dynamic that it&#8217;s hard for a power attack to keep up, as anybody who watched the last SECCG game could tell you.</p>
<p>Plus, the rules.</p>
<blockquote><p>Rodriguez has found plenty of ways to implement the RPO game into his playbook. It&#8217;s hard to see why you wouldn&#8217;t. &#8220;Anything you run in the quick passing game, you can basically tag onto a run play,&#8221; he said. &#8220;In college, where the [blockers] can get three yards downfield, you can run just about every run play, specifically your zone, with your quick game and have the best of both worlds.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And that&#8217;s assuming the refs even bother to enforce that much.</p>
<p>Needless to say, I&#8217;m very curious to see where Kirby goes with the offense from here.</p>
]]></html></oembed>