<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Get The Picture]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Senator Blutarsky]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blutarsky.wordpress.com/author/blutarsky/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Why they playin&#8217;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>A &#8216;rona here, a &#8216;rona there and pretty soon <a href="https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/29198526" target="_blank" rel="noopener">you&#8217;re talking about real money</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Patrick Rishe, director of the sports business program at Washington University in St. Louis, believes the upcoming football season will be played &#8212; even if it&#8217;s during the spring &#8212; because of &#8220;astronomical financial implications&#8221; for athletic departments if it is canceled.</p>
<p>Quite simply, college athletics might not have a financial choice.</p>
<p>Rishe estimates that the 65 Power 5 schools would collectively lose more than $4 billion in football revenues, with at least $1.2 billion of that due to lost ticket revenue. Each Power 5 school would see at least an average loss of $62 million in football revenue, including at least $18.6 million in football ticket sales, he said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I can see where that could be a problem.  There&#8217;s more to it than just that number, though.</p>
<p>For one thing, while TV is the main revenue driver, what comes from ticket sales isn&#8217;t inconsequential.</p>
<blockquote><p>Public school Power 5 athletic departments on average made nearly half of their total operating revenue from football, with about 14% coming from football ticket sales alone, according to an analysis of 2017-18 financial data provided to ESPN by Syracuse University&#8217;s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications.</p></blockquote>
<p>Athletic departments still need those asses in the seats to cover their nut&#8230; well, with a couple of exceptions.</p>
<blockquote><p>About half of the public Power 5 athletic departments were self-sustaining in 2017-18, meaning revenue covered expenses without funding from student fees or university support. Take away football ticket revenue alone and only two schools still make the cut &#8212; Georgia and Texas A&amp;M &#8212; according to the data from Syracuse University.</p></blockquote>
<p>So where do you draw the line about attendance?  It&#8217;s one thing to set up a regimen to test players and staff rigorously, but you can&#8217;t do that with your fan base.</p>
<p>Ah, but you say, that&#8217;s where the reserve fund comes in.  Genius!  Cover the shortfall as needed, as that rainy day is finally here. Sounds good, except&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>In a multibillion-dollar industry, fewer than half of FBS athletic departments have financial reserves in place that could be used during this type of crisis, according to a recent survey by Lead1 Association, the professional organization that represents athletic directors at 130 FBS schools. In the survey of more than 100 ADs, 41% of Power 5 and 26% of Group of 5 departments confirmed having such a reserve.</p></blockquote>
<p>But here&#8217;s the thing.  Even at a place like Georgia that&#8217;s managed to save&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>A self-sustaining budget coupled with financial reserves places the University of Georgia in a better financial position than most FBS schools should there be a canceled, shortened or delayed football season this fall.</p>
<p>According to the UGA athletic department, it has more than $102 million in reserve funds, which includes 2019-20 reserves, long-term investments and general endowment funds.</p>
<p>&#8220;We never thought it would be at this level,&#8221; UGA athletic director Greg McGarity said. &#8220;With a $153 million budget [for the 2019-20 fiscal year], we tried to stay in that three- to six-month period so we would be able to sustain our program.&#8221;</p>
<p>Georgia&#8217;s football program accounted for almost half of the athletic department&#8217;s $174 million in revenue from ticket sales and contributions alone in the 2018-19 fiscal year, according to its most recent NCAA Membership Financial Report. The Bulldogs generated $34.6 million in football ticket sales and $44.3 million from donations, much of which is attached to those tickets.</p>
<p>&#8220;You can run all of the numbers and projections, but if you don&#8217;t have that football part, it&#8217;s just agonizing,&#8221; McGarity said. &#8220;If you don&#8217;t have football revenue, where does your revenue come from? It&#8217;s a huge void that would create some dire situations on the operation of a program.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230; the first instinct isn&#8217;t to breathe a sigh of relief and tap those funds.  It&#8217;s to do everything possible to make a football season happen, regardless.  It&#8217;s as if the main point of having a reserve fund is not to use it.</p>
<blockquote><p>Once criticized for not spending enough in the SEC&#8217;s seemingly never-ending arms race, the Bulldogs&#8217; reserves will enable them to make things work &#8212; at least in the short term &#8212; if they can&#8217;t play football this fall or face a truncated, conference-only season.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s why they playin&#8217;.  Everywhere.</p>
]]></html></oembed>