<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Irresistibly Fish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://brettfish.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[brettfish]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://brettfish.wordpress.com/author/brettfish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[perfection quotient]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>has anyone heard of this new term being bandied about &#8211; perfection quotient &#8211; as a purely subjective means of describing a thing in terms of how closely it comes &#8211; in your mind and appreciation &#8211; to being perfect&#8230;</p>
<p>so yesterday i made a peppermint crisp tart which was incredible but definitely not perfect so i would give it a perfection quotient of 1.3 which means basically it scores an 8.7 out of ten but with this new trend scores a 1.3 short of perfection and thus a PQ (as they are calling it) of 1.3 &#8211; as something can never be more perfect than perfect (altho again this is a subjective scale so i guess you will get people who talk about giving 110% effort to something &#8211; when there is no more effort possible than 100% get a life &#8211; who will try and work the system so to speak) the highest PQ possible is a 0 which is perfect</p>
<p>the other thing with this scale is that it is a specifically comparative scale and so i am rating peppermint tart against the perfect peppermint tart, not against chocolate or God or a great soccer goal &#8211; which is also a new way of looking at something &#8211; so in the category it is in how closely does it rate to the perfect one of its type as you see it (so a perfection quotient can never be wrong, altho perhaps stupid, ha!)</p>
<p>i like it &#8211; anyone else heard about this? and what PQ would your latest peppermint tart receive?</p>
]]></html></oembed>