<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Irresistibly Fish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://brettfish.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[brettfish]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://brettfish.wordpress.com/author/brettfish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[shtupidt people 101: part&nbsp;police&#8230;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>so i read this article in the restaurant this morning while waiting for my buddy to arrive.</p>
<p>firstly it was set in miami</p>
<p>secondly the premise of it is completely hilarious slash disturbing as in this line: &#8216;burglars snorted remains of a man and two dogs in the mistaken belief that they had stolen illegal drugs&#8217; </p>
<p>thirdly, that&#8217;s not the best part</p>
<p>fourthly it goes on &#8216;once they realised their error the suspects discussed returning the remaining ashes, but threw them in a lake instead because they thought their fingerprints were on the containers&#8217;</p>
<p>and the clincher for me was this: &#8216;police divers were tring to recover the ashes&#8217;</p>
<p>like really? the way the article (Cape Times newspaper, 21 Jan for reference) is written &#8211; they were going to return the ashes then threw them (the ashes) into a lake and now police divers are trying to retrieve them. with what? underwater goggle microscopes and a pair of tweezers? in hindsight i guess what would make more sense is if the divers are swimming in the lake looking for the urn, but without that realisation the whole thing seems a lot more gary larsen or jack handey and qualifies for shtupidt people 101 &#8211; heeeeere&#8217;s your sign&#8230;</p>
]]></html></oembed>