<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Irresistibly Fish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://brettfish.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[brettfish]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://brettfish.wordpress.com/author/brettfish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[the ABC of writing a blog, and invoking hate speech and&nbsp;candyfloss]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>i used to think a blog was just a way to get your thorts down&#8230; in a public space because yes someone else might be interested in hearing what you think; or else it was an opportunity to make some laugh or challenge someone about life and living; and of course the opportunity to have moments of complete randomness, because i like random. it helps fill in the gaps.</p>
<p>but i&#8217;m learning that that is not what writing a blog is all about at all [i love sentences that allow you to have the word &#8220;that&#8221; twice in a row and still make sense] and so here is my breakdown of one way blog-writing works [that involves hate speech, personal attack and waves of candyfloss]</p>
<p>[A] i write a blog about a topic</p>
<p>[B] someone makes a comment off topic and starts a heated discussion when i politely respond to them which generates into a heated debate</p>
<p>[C] somewhere further down someone joins in and backs their unrelated-to-blog debate and throws in a personal attack either directed at me [&#8220;you hate animals&#8221;] or else Christians [&#8220;christians hate animals&#8221;] </p>
<p>[D] from their many years of experience of knowing me and having any idea of what i am about one of the above people will make an absolute statement summing up who i am as a person [&#8220;you write blogs because you are desperate to receive all the fame that comes with writing blogs&#8221; &#8211; hm, they may have spelt &#8220;defame&#8221; wrong] </p>
<p>that is one way it goes and then eventually i might get tired of approving comments that are unrelated to the original blog and causing destraction and so may even refuse to approve one or two [hardly ever happens] and even delete a couple to clear up the blog which brings in its own wave of &#8220;you always&#8221; and &#8220;christians never&#8221; statements</p>
<p>there is another way of achieving the same results i have found:</p>
<p>[A] starts with a friendly request &#8211; &#8220;hey there, i really like orangutangs, do you think you could make a link to my &#8216;i love orangutangs&#8217; site because i would really like that</p>
<p>[B] i reply with an honest, &#8220;i choose not to like that site because i choose not to given that i have a right to choose to like or not like a site and i don&#8217;t particularly like this one&#8221; </p>
<p>[C] friendly request changes tone &#8211; &#8220;you are evil and hate animals and so do all christians and you probably kill baby seals for fun and don&#8217;t put the toilet seat down&#8221;</p>
<p>[D] i smile. because i realise once again that writing a blog or a weekly thort or recording a podcast is not as simple and straightforward as i imagined and i stop for a second and wonder to myself if there will ever come a day when someone writes a comment related to the blogpost above it. but then i return to reality. </p>
<p>how am i able to smile and keep smiling? engage and keep engaging? love and keep loving? hope and keep hoping?&#8230; well, as my good friend Dr Seuss once wrote: “Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don&#8217;t matter and those who matter don&#8217;t mind.”</p>
]]></html></oembed>