<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[They&#8217;re just more important than you&nbsp;are]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Andy McCarthy blows the fog away from the NYT&#8217;s position and makes it clear why they <a target="_blank">choose treason</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>The <i>Times</i> prattles on about what it claims is a dearth of checks and balances, but what are the checks and balances on Bill Keller? Can it be that our security hinges on whether the editor of an antiwar, for-profit journal thinks some defense measure might be <i>interesting</i>?</p></blockquote>
<p>I know that this blog is only read by a handful. So far, at least. And yet I hope that nobody reading Buttle&#8217;s World is giving a penny of subscription money to the <i>New York Times</i> or the <i>Los Angelese Times</i>.</p>
<p>We have to draw the line somewhere.</p>
<p>And tell a friend.</p>
<p><b>UPDATE:</b></p>
<p>The Editors at NRO have a good idea of what else to do to the <i>Times</i>: <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDVhYWQzMmQ3YWRlNzFkYjRmZmY4ZTQzZmUwZjJhZjI=" TARGET="_blank">Yank their White House press pass</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>