<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Be Skeptical]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>While not taking our enemy seriously is a good way to lose the Long War, taking everything our own government says at face value is unwise as well. <i>The Register</i>, that hardy band of skeptics in England, points out that the noise about binary explosives may be <a href="http://www.theregister.com/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/" TARGET="_blank">bunkum</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>We asked University of Rhode Island Chemistry Professor Jimmie C. Oxley, who has actual, practical experience with TATP, if this is a reasonable assumption, and she told us that merely dumping the precursors together would create &#8220;a violent reaction,&#8221; but not a detonation.</p>
<p>To release the energy needed to bring down a plane (far more difficult to do than many imagine, as Aloha Airlines Flight 243 neatly illustrates), it&#8217;s necessary to synthesize a good amount of TATP with care.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the whole thing to learn how silly the idea of mixing TATP in the lavatory really is.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s a big leap from debunking TATP to claiming that binary liquid explosives are &#8220;out of the question&#8221;. But as someone who seriously doubts that air travel under the boot of the TSA is <i>any</i> safer than September 10th, I suspect the <i>Register</i> guys are right.</p>
]]></html></oembed>