<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[God and Man in the&nbsp;Dorm]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>If you follow <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/" TARGET="_blank">The Corner</a> you know about last week&#8217;s &#8220;dorm room&#8221; conversation (as Jpod called it) about religiosity and conservatism. Today Derb linked to a great summary by an obviously bright agnostic, <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp/2006/08/god_heather_mac_donald_and_con.php" TARGET="_blank">Razib Khan of Gene Expression</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p> Mac Donald clearly believes that reason and skepticism, in concert with a healthy dose of empiricism, can serve as the grounding for a conservative &amp; traditionalist worldview. I tend to agree, and, as an empirical fact I have met many individuals who lack a belief in God but are generally conservative.  Where Heather stands apart has been her recent vocality in attacking the symbiotic relationship between American conservatism and religion over the last generation.  I think Ponnuru is correct that the Republican party isn&#8217;t going to lose atheist &amp; agnostic votes over their religiosity, we&#8217;re probably less than 5% of the population (most people with &#8220;No religion&#8221; are theists of some sort).  Additionally, last I checked <I>The Almanac of American Politics</i> unbelievers only gave 20-30% of their votes for Republicans anyhow.  Republicans worrying about losing the Jewish vote is a good analogy, Jews cast about 3 out of 4 votes in a given election for Democrats, and they are fewer than 1 out of 20 voters.  <b>But, there was a reason in the 1950s William F. Buckley expelled the anti-Semities from the conservative movement</b>. In fact, there were two reasons:</p>
<p>1) The conservative movement included many Jews from the beginning. Frank Meyer, the father of fusionism being a prominent early example (Kristol and Podhoretz came on board in the 70s).  Even if Jews are a trivial proportion of the &#8220;base,&#8221; they are numerous in the &#8220;braintrust.&#8221;</p>
<p>2) Jews are not the only group that rejects anti-Semitism, many American Christians are not particularly tolerant of this attitude.  Though Jews did not form much of the base, those who would be turned off by anti-Semitism do (this was before the influx of philo-Semitic evangelicals, the conservative movement in the 1950s was a coalition of Jews, secularists and &#8220;High Church&#8221; Christians).</p></blockquote>
<p>Includes updates and some interesting reader comments. I&#8217;m going to bookmark that site.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>Derb <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTg5YzNmNTIwMjY3YTlhNmJlMTJkMDIzODZiYjk0ZWY=" TARGET="_blank">notes</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Razib wishes it known that he is an atheist, not an agnostic.  Nice to know that a Madrassa education can do that.</p></blockquote>
<p>And Heather Mac Donald has a wonderful reply to Novak about what&#8217;s <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OGYxNDFiMzdiZjZjMDExZjYxYmUxODExMzBkYmUyYmQ=" TARGET="_blank">what&#8217;s right and wrong with religion</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>