<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[An Inconvenient Truth?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t chased all the links down, but <a href="http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/Cosmic_rays_and_climate.htm">this</a> could be inconvenient if your wagon is hitched to the anthropogenec global warming bandwagon. Seems the sun&#8217;s output has not been so steady &#8211; and visible radiation isn&#8217;t the thing to watch anyhow.</p>
<blockquote><p>How big a deal is this indirect cloud effect? Huge, actually. In just 5 years it was responsible for a 2% decrease in low clouds (the kind that reflect incoming solar radiation by day) which, in turn, equates to an increase in surface warming of 1.2 Wm-2 from incident radiation &#8212; equivalent to some 85% of the IPCC&#8217;s estimate for the effect of all carbon dioxide increase since the Industrial Revolution.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>