<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Fore!]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Sowell <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTI2ZDVkNGFkOTMwOGJlZTBlZjQ2N2RhYjhlMjQ4MDU=">tees up</a> on San Francisco.</p>
<blockquote><p>San Francisco has six municipal golf courses — and they are losing money. Now there is all sorts of hand-wringing over what to do about it.</p>
<p>An economist might see this as a non-problem. If the golf courses are losing money, then get rid of them. Given San Francisco&#8217;s sky-high land prices, selling the land that the golf courses are on would bring in millions, if not billions, of dollars. </p>
<p>But such advice is why so few economists get elected to political office.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is San Francisco an easy target? Sure. But Sowell&#8217;s economics lessons are always as entertaining as they are educational.</p>
]]></html></oembed>