<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Calderon Promises to Keep Mexicans at&nbsp;Home]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>As reported <a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/border/44040.php">here</a>, the new Mexican President is showing signs of being much better than Vicente &#8220;Clinton&#8221; Fox, not that it would be too hard. This is good:</p>
<blockquote><p>If implemented, his proposals could help transform Mexico from a labor-exporting country with relatively low growth, productivity and wages into an investment-rich, job-producing economy with better living standards for its 107 million people, nearly half of whom still live in poverty.</p></blockquote>
<p>But this is why I caution that there is no such thing as a conservative in Mexican politics:</p>
<blockquote><p>Among other things, he has proposed labor, energy and judicial reforms to encourage investment, promote competition and create jobs; improved tax collection to generate more revenue to fight poverty and improve education; universal health care and support for small and medium-size businesses.</p></blockquote>
<p>Since when has &#8220;more [government] revenue&#8221; ever fought poverty?</p>
<p>Still, this looks to be quite an improvement. Calderon at least seems to know how to govern. Fox was, just like Clinton, a campaign-only president. He just kept campaigning all through his term. But he&#8217;s not as clever or well-read as Clinton.</p>
]]></html></oembed>