<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Steyn: Get Real]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Steyn correctly identifies the <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/steyn/351710,CST-EDT-STEYN22.article">disconnect from reality</a> that &#8220;gun-free&#8221; zones represent. The bottom line:</p>
<blockquote><p>The &#8220;gun-free zone&#8221; fraud isn&#8217;t just about banning firearms or even a symptom of academia&#8217;s distaste for an entire sensibility of which the Second Amendment is part and parcel but part of a deeper reluctance of critical segments of our culture to engage with reality. Michelle Malkin wrote a column a few days ago connecting the prohibition against physical self-defense with &#8220;the erosion of intellectual self-defense,&#8221; and the retreat of college campuses into a smothering security blanket of speech codes and &#8220;safe spaces&#8221; that&#8217;s the very opposite of the principles of honest enquiry and vigorous debate on which university life was founded. And so we &#8220;fear guns,&#8221; and &#8220;verbal violence,&#8221; and excessively realistic swashbuckling in the varsity production of &#8221;The Three Musketeers.&#8221; What kind of functioning society can emerge from such a cocoon?
</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>