<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Algore&#8217;s Honesty]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if His Dimness ever thought what the book title looks like:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Assault On Reason<br />
by Al Gore</p></blockquote>
<p>Freudians could have a field day.</p>
<p>Over at the <em>American Thinker</em>, Marc Sheppard lays out the <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/06/manmade_global_warming_the_rea.html">real assault</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Adding a false sense of legitimacy to the over-hyping of CO2&#8217;s potential greenhouse gas (GHG) effect on warming is the oft-Gore-quoted yet woefully compromised Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).  These United Nations based &#8220;consensus builders&#8221; summarily dismiss solar activity in favor of more politically favorable culprits. </p>
<p>One former member and current outspoken critic of the panel testified to its bias before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in May of 2001. As I wrote following the release of the Working Group I Summary in February of this year, Dr. Richard Lindzen swore that, based on his experiences as a member, the IPCC was actually created specifically to support negotiations concerning CO2 emission reductions and would accept no contrary findings from its members.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the whole thing.</p>
]]></html></oembed>