<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Hall of Shame]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>The <em>American Thinker</em> has put together a <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/08/its_not_just_scott_beauchamp.html">list of MSM deceptions</a> going back decades, along with a <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/08/scott_beauchamp_is_not_alone_i.html">followup list</a>.<br />
He asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>These offenses have been going on for years, long before the internet.  But there does seems to be a rise in the number of reported offenses in recent years.  Did the number of offenses go up, or did the fraction of discovered offenses go up?</p></blockquote>
<p>I suspect the answer is &#8220;yes&#8221;. Fauxtography, in particular, has been much enabled by Photoshop. But the press has been lying for a long, long time.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>:</p>
<p>Miniter writes <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/2007/08/how_the_new_republic_got_sucke.php">How The New Republic Got Suckered.</a> I don&#8217;t think a passive verb is appropriate. Did you know what position Beauchamp&#8217;s wife holds at <em>TNR</em>? And who the only person to be fired over the incident is?</p>
<p>Not to be missed.</p>
]]></html></oembed>