<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Weekly World News may be&nbsp;gone]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>but fret not. The rest of the MSM will continue to pick up the slack.</p>
<p>The best teacher I had in High School taught us to view TV &#8220;news&#8221; critically. With only a half hour, minus commercials and sports, to provide the information we need to be responsible, informed citizens, they show us a building on fire. Unless you own or live in that building, that&#8217;s just not news.</p>
<p>ABC picked up a tabloid style &#8220;human interest&#8221; story from Venezuela about a <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=3611647">man who reportedly &#8220;woke up&#8221; on the autopsy table</a>. Now, let&#8217;s be generous and stipulate that although this can&#8217;t qualify as a real news story it&#8217;s at least odd and unusual enough that people will want to read it. That&#8217;s how it got linked on Drudge, after all.</p>
<p>My beef with ABC is that they accepted the story uncritically, without spending five minutes to reason it out and research.</p>
<p>Start with the scar on the guy&#8217;s face. Does that look like a scalpel incision to you? Looks to me more like a bicycle accident or a bar brawl. Second, doesn&#8217;t it seem fishy that an autopsy would start with an incision on the chin?</p>
<p>To keep you informed and appropriately skeptical, <em>Buttle&#8217;s World</em> did the research. It just so happens that we have a reader who has actually done autopsies. I told him I smelled a rat.</p>
<p><em>Note: If you&#8217;d rather not read the description of an autopsy, <strong>stop here</strong>. The executive summary is that they don&#8217;t start by cutting the face.<br />
</em></p>
<blockquote><p>I smell one, too.</p>
<p>If there was a forensic reason to open the chin (such as to extract a bullet or examine the path of a wound), it might be done, but you&#8217;d do that after the main part of the autopsy.</p>
<p>Besides, a scalpel incision of the chin should not cause &#8220;excruciating&#8221; pain.</p>
<p>Routine autopsy procedure:</p>
<ol>
1) A Y-shaped incision, with each arm of the Y going up the chest, the the leg of the Y going down the abdomen.</p>
<p>        The skin is peeled back, and the chest wall cut free (we used branch cutters).</p>
<p>        All organs (including the trachea, larynx, and tongue, en bloc) are removed through this Y incision.</p>
<p>        After the organs are weighed and samples taken for microscopic analysis, the remains are all poured back into the chest/abdomen cavity like a slurry, and the chest wall is wired back in place.</ol>
<ol>
2) A U-shaped incision from ear to ear.  The scalp is peeled back anterior and posteriorly, exposing the skull.  The calvaria (skullcap) is sawed off so that the brain may be removed.</p>
<p>        The brain is placed in formaldehyde for examination about a week later.
</ol>
<p>A morgue attendant* then sews up the incisions.  Add a competent undertaker, and you can have an open-casket funeral without any tell-tale signs of an autopsy.</p>
<p>*The word <em>Diener</em> is German for servant. In English, it is used to describe the person, in the morgue, responsible for handling, moving, and cleaning the corpse. It is derived from the German word <em>Leichendiener</em>, which literally means corpse servant. Dieners are also referred to as morgue attendants.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>