<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[I&#8217;m With Hitch]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>At least in large measure, in his <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2184186/" target="_blank">parsimonious advice for Rowan Williams</a>.</p>
<p>Where we part company is here:</p>
<blockquote><p>The alternative—don&#8217;t have any blasphemy laws and let religious people&#8217;s feelings be hurt, just as the feelings of the secular are regularly offended by religion—doesn&#8217;t occur to the archbishop and people who think like him.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have no more sympathy for the secular than the religious when it comes to feelings being offended. Nobody&#8217;s religion (or secularity, for that matter) offends my feelings. Why should it? Now, if someone&#8217;s religion involves replacing my constitutional republic with barbarism, then I&#8217;m offended. In that case it&#8217;s not my feelings, but my freedom which is threatened.</p>
<p>In the end, Hitch is right: there should be no blasphemy laws. If your beliefs can&#8217;t take ridicule, maybe they aren&#8217;t worth much.</p>
]]></html></oembed>