<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Peter Robinson has a fun&nbsp;job]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>He gets to meet and interview some really interesting people.</p>
<p>Treat yourself to <a href="http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=ZWY2NTViMTM4NGU3YjM2NTAwNTA4ZTQ0NGRjMzcxOTQ=" target="_blank">part 1</a> and <a href="http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=MjA0ZjhiMWI1YTQxNGY0YmM0Y2YwMTc4NDIyYmQwMDU=" target="_blank">part 2</a> of his interview with Tom Wolfe. I especially like Wolfe&#8217;s explanation of the Charming Aristocracy in part 2.</p>
<p>One of his readers <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzUzMTllZDM4ZGY3OWM0MWMxYzZhYTkwMTcxYmYzYmI=" target="_blank">observes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>What he said about the charming aristocracy perfectly describes, it seems to me, the sophisticates who support Obama. [They think that] those of us who are lesser beings can&#8217;t possibly understand what Obama is and what his election portends for the country.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Update</strong>:</p>
<p>Another reader takes it a <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODU2NzNhNjQyZDJlNmE5NDFkNTU5MmUzNmE5MTkxOTk=" target="_blank">step further</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Tom Wolfe, in his description of the charming aristocracy, outlines many of the habits of liberals in general. He points out that the aristocracy comes to believe that the simple &#8220;journalism&#8221; is too low-brow for them. I have seen this exact attitude in many who embrace anti-Americanism, anti-patriotism, and most liberal points of view because they don&#8217;t want to seem pedestrian. When they come up against someone who is well educated, reasonably refined, AND conservative, they are at a loss to explain it. Hence, the difficulty understanding someone like William F. Buckley and his peers (did he actually have any peers?).</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>