<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Philosophical Angle on Intelligent&nbsp;Design]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>A good take down <a href="http://larryherzberg.com/wordpress/2009/02/25/intelligent-design/" target="_blank">here</a> by Larry Herzberg.</p>
<p>The strongest objection relates to the fallacy of the man who was dealt a Royal Flush and said, since the odds are so great against being dealt this hand I must not have it.</p>
<p>If Earth, the universe, and the laws of physics seem fine-tuned for our existence it&#8217;s because we are a <em>product</em> of the earth, the universe and the laws of physics. Life does exist and, as a commenter above points out, winning the lottery is not a proof of the existence of any god.</p>
]]></html></oembed>