<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[De-Baptism?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Remember those guys who put the <a href="https://buttle.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/the-new-humanism/" target="_blank">wrong message</a> on the busses in England? They, and others like them, are trying to get <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ae71a038e9b3b47af4f0e9eac9598fd8.2b1&amp;show_article=1" target="_blank">de-baptised </a>from their churches.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a very hard time following the logic here. If the state of being baptised or not has meaning then that implies that the religion is valid. If the religion is a fantasy whether or not one is baptised carries no weight.</p>
<p>I suppose it means that just because someone has moved beyond faith doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;ve learned to think, or have reflected at all upon life.</p>
<p>I suggest these &#8220;rationalists&#8221; just move on and get a life.</p>
]]></html></oembed>