<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Question that Flummoxed the Great&nbsp;Orator]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>In The Guardian, no less, signs that they see the Emperor as <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/03/g20-barack-obama-nick-robinson-question" target="_blank">underdressed</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>We were seeing the same mismatch between the regulatory regimes that were in place and er &#8230; pause<strong> [I&#8217;VE LOST MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT AGAIN] &#8230;</strong> the highly integrated, er, global capital markets that have emerged &#8230; pause<strong> [I&#8217;M REALLY WINGING IT NOW].</strong> So at this point, I&#8217;m less interested in &#8230; pause <strong>[YOU] &#8230; </strong>identifying blame than fixing the problem. I think we&#8217;ve taken some very aggressive steps in the United States to do so, not just responding to the immediate crisis, ensuring banks are adequately capitalised, er, dealing with the enormous, er &#8230; pause <strong>[WHY DIDN&#8217;T I QUIT WHILE I WAS AHEAD?] &#8230; </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Mark Steyn <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWFjOWE3Y2NlZWFkMDAzMzc0MTNkNzAxYmUyYTFlYzU=" target="_blank">theorizes</a> on the motive behind this new clarity.</p>
<blockquote><p>It makes an instructive contrast with the hopeychangey sob-sisters of the US media, and one that may not be unrelated to the latter&#8217;s impending rendezvous with destiny.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>