<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Grandpa Sponge]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>If creationists don&#8217;t like to admit that we&#8217;re apes, they&#8217;re <em>really</em> not going to like <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227061.300-sponge-larvae-your-unlikely-ancestors.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news" target="_blank">this</a>. Fascinating story, though. Be sure to check out the <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/gallery/mg20227061300-sponge-larvae-your-unlikely-ancestors/" target="_blank">illustrated steps</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
However, sponges seem unlikely ancestors. They are little more than a loose assemblage of cells that lack the true tissues and organs found in higher animals. Plus their structure &#8211; a porous mass of interconnected water channels &#8211; is nothing like that of any other animal. As a result, most zoologists tend to put sponges on a side branch of the animal tree, an abortive experiment that led nowhere. That&#8217;s what makes Kevin Peterson&#8217;s results so thought-provoking.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>