<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Our Most Radical&nbsp;President]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Krauthammer has it <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTRmMWUxOWQyMGZjYmQ3NjljZDM2Yjg5OTFhMzFhOTQ=" target="_blank">exactly right</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>But once the law is passed, the only job a judge has is to interpret the law without consideration of a person&#8217;s standing in life. Otherwise you could never have, say, a bank foreclosing on a home, because who, after all, is more affected, a bank that might lose a few dollars, or a family that&#8217;s going to lose its home and future livelihood, et cetera?</p>
<p>The whole idea blinds a justice and the statutes that we have outside our courthouses of a blindfold over justice is that you do not look at a person&#8217;s station in life, their needs in life, requirements in life. It&#8217;s entirely about the law.</p>
<p>And for Obama to state the exact opposite openly as a way that will guide him in his appointments is quite radical.</p></blockquote>
<p>I could see this coming before the election, and I know I&#8217;m not the only one.</p>
]]></html></oembed>