<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[So Much for So&nbsp;Little]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the potential benefit of what Tom McClintock calls &#8220;<a href="http://blog.tommcclintock.com/2009/06/29/the-biggest-economic-mistake-since-the-days-of-herbert-hoover/" target="_blank">the biggest economic mistake since the days of Herbert Hoover</a>?</p>
<p>Not much. A few tenths of a degree. But there&#8217;s a <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzE2M2YxMzU4OWVjZTdkMTQ1NWNiZTI1OTk3ZDEyMjM=" target="_blank">lot at risk</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>The problem is that we’re putting a global economy with present value of $2,000 trillion at risk to go after less than $4 trillion of expected present value of benefit. The desire to regulate the global economy to avoid the risk of catastrophic climate change is not a one-sided bet.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anybody outside California is asked to ponder this: Do you really want the whole country going the way this state is going?</p>
]]></html></oembed>