<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Gee, ya <em>think</em>?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>It just may turn out that <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/sciencefair/2009/07/could-we-be-wrong-about-global-warming.html" target="_blank">current climate models are wrong</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In a nutshell, theoretical models cannot explain what we observe in the geological record,&#8221; says oceanographer Gerald Dickens, study co-author and professor of Earth Science at Rice University in Houston. &#8220;There appears to be something fundamentally wrong with the way temperature and carbon are linked in climate models.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Again: I&#8217;m old enough to remember overpopulation, global cooling, DDT killing birds and the hole in the ozone. All bogus. Chicken Little has really been quite consistent.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to confirm a model when you <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/15/giss-worlds-airports-continue-to-run-warmer-than-row/#more-9184" target="_blank">can&#8217;t even be sure of the data</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>