<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Brave, Brave Sir&nbsp;Robins]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Classical Values asks, <a href="http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2010/01/wheres_the_brav.html" target="_blank">where&#8217;s the brave art world that stood up to John Ashcroft</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>According to the New York Post, they have a bad case of &#8220;jihad jitters.&#8221; &#8220;The Metropolitan Museum of Art,&#8221; the Post reported yesterday, &#8220;quietly pulled images of the Prophet Mohammed from its Islamic collection and may not include them in a renovated exhibition area slated to open in 2011.&#8221; Why? &#8220;The museum said the controversial images &#8212; objected to by conservative Muslims who say their religion forbids images of their holy founder &#8212; were &#8216;under review.'&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>If any religion needs to be offended, on a regular basis, it is Islam. As long as it has members who get violent when offended it needs to be treated with contempt. It&#8217;s quite fine for the members of a religion to be offended, to complain, and to not like what they perceive as offensive. But religious violence must not be tolerated.</p>
<p>If offense can damage your faith, your faith is of no value.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong></p>
<p>In fairness, Ask-Imam.com seems to be <a href="http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.com/2010/01/ok-let-me-rephrase-if-you-fall-asleep.html" target="_blank">doing a pretty good job</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>