<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Buttle&#039;s World]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[clgood]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://buttle.wordpress.com/author/buttle/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[California Ballot Propositions]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m likely to vote according to <a href="http://chuckdevore.com/2010/10/assemblyman-chuck-devore’s-statewide-ballot-proposition-recommendations/" target="_blank">Chuck DeVore&#8217;s recommendations.</a> The only one I&#8217;m vacillating on is Prop 19. His concerns are valid, but I also wonder if it could end up hurting the Mexican drug cartels, and thus helping us. The rest seem pretty obvious.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong></p>
<p>The always reliable Tom McClintock has published his <a href="http://www.tommcclintock.com/blog/tom-mcclintock-on-the-propositions" target="_blank">ballot propositions recommendations</a>. He just put me on the &#8220;no&#8221; side of Prop 19. They disagree on Prop 22, which leaves me in a quandary. I may have to invoke the &#8220;when in doubt, vote NO&#8221; rule. Or maybe the &#8220;when in doubt, go with McClintock&#8221; rule. This could be tough.</p>
<p><strong>Updated (and bumped):</strong></p>
<p>Still not positive about Prop 22. Am finding Chuck&#8217;s argument about it being a wolf in sheep&#8217;s clothing more persuasive, and that fits my &#8220;vote no&#8221; default as well.</p>
<p>Other California items:</p>
<p>Governor: Meg Whitman. Why? Because she&#8217;s not Jerry Brown.</p>
<p>Senator: Carly Fiorina. Why? Because she&#8217;s not Barbara Boxer.</p>
<p>Attorney General: Steve Cooley, probably. Just make sure Kamala Harris doesn&#8217;t get the job!</p>
<p>The following are those who should be rewarded for their votes on gun rights. Correct and clear application of the Second Amendment is the most reliable litmus test there is in politics. It&#8217;s hard to find people on the right side of this issue who are wrong on other substantial issues.</p>
<p>Controller: Tony Strickland</p>
<p>Treasurer: Mimi Walters</p>
<p>Insurance Commisioner: Mike Villines</p>
<p>Congressional District 10: Gary Clift</p>
<p>State Assembly District 3: Dan Logue</p>
<p>State Assembly District 4: Ted Gaines</p>
<p>State Assembly District 10: Alyson Huber</p>
<p>State Assembly District 17 Cathleen Galgiani</p>
<p>State Assembly District 20: Adnan Shahab</p>
<p>State Assembly District 27: Linda &#8220;Ellie&#8221; Black</p>
<p>State Assembly District 34: Conny Conway</p>
<p>State Assembly District 36: Steve Knight (one of the few really good guys in Sacramento)</p>
<p>State Assembly District 60: Curt Hagman</p>
<p>State Assembly District 66: Kevin Jefferies</p>
<p>State Assembly District 72: Chris Norby</p>
<p>State Assembly District 73: Kiane Harkey</p>
<p>State Assembly District 74: Martin Garrick</p>
<p>State Assembly District 75: Nathan Fletcher</p>
<p>State Senate District 12: Anna Caballero</p>
<p>State Senate District 14: Tom Berryhill</p>
<p>State Senate District 18: Jean Fuller</p>
<p>State Senate District 34: Lou Correa</p>
<p>State Senate District 38: Mark Wyland</p>
<p>Anybody on the following list should be vehemently opposed in any case:</p>
<p>Jarad Huffman</p>
<p>Mariko Yamada</p>
<p>Fiona Ma</p>
<p>Tom Ammiano</p>
<p>Mary Hayashi</p>
<p>Jerry Hill</p>
<p>Paul Fong</p>
<p>Jim Beall</p>
<p>Bill Monning</p>
<p>Bob Blumenfield</p>
<p>Julia Brownley</p>
<p>Mike Feuer</p>
<p>Anthony Portantino</p>
<p>Gil Cedillo</p>
<p>Mike Eng</p>
<p>Isadore Hall</p>
<p>Bonnie Lowenthal</p>
<p>Warren Furutani</p>
<p>Wilmer Carter</p>
<p>Jose Solario</p>
<p>Marty Block</p>
<p>Manuel Perez</p>
<p>Noreen Evans</p>
<p>Darrell Steinberg</p>
<p>Leland Yee</p>
<p>Ellen Corbett</p>
<p>Alex Padilla</p>
<p>Curren Price</p>
<p>Ron Calderon</p>
<p>Gloria Negrete-McLeod</p>
<p>So get out there tomorrow and <strong>VOTE</strong>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>