<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Cortical Chauvinism]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://corticalchauvinism.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[m0casa02]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://corticalchauvinism.com/author/m0casa02/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[NIH to limit the amount of grant money a scientist can&nbsp;receive]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>US agency creates point system to address imbalance in distribution of research funds</p>
<p>The following is the introduction from an article written by Sara Reardon on Nature. The whole article can be accessed from <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/nih-to-limit-the-amount-of-grant-money-a-scientist-can-receive-1.21930" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/news/nih-to-limit-the-amount-of-grant-money-a-scientist-can-receive-1.21930</a></p>
<p>For the first time, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) will restrict the amount of funding that an individual scientist can hold at any one time, on the basis of a point system. The move, <a href="https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/new-nih-approach-grant-funding-aimed-optimizing-stewardship-taxpayer-dollars">announced on 2 May</a>, is part of an ongoing effort to make obtaining grants easier for early- and mid-career scientists, who <a href="https://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/538446a">face much tougher odds</a> than <a href="https://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/482450a">their more-experienced colleagues</a>.</p>
<p>“Because scientific discovery is inherently unpredictable, there are reasons to believe that supporting more researchers working on a diversity of biomedical problems, rather than concentrating resources in a smaller number of labs, might maximize the number of important discoveries that can emerge from the science we support,” NIH director Francis Collins wrote in a blogpost. In doing so, he added, the policy could improve “returns on taxpayers’ investments”.</p>
<p>According to the agency, just <a href="https://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/482450a">10% of grant recipients win 40% of the agency’s research money</a>. Advocacy organizations and groups that advise the NIH director have been urging the agency to address this inequality for more than a decade. They are also concerned that increasing competition for grant money drives researchers to spend more time on paperwork and personnel issues associated with grants, and less time in the lab.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://corticalchauvinism.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/nih_grants_and_funding_.jpeg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[255]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>