<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Critique of Crisis Theory]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[critiqueofcrisistheory]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com/author/critiqueofcrisistheory/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Does Capitalist Production Have a Long Cycle? (pt&nbsp;8)]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><strong>The United States hardest hit by the super-crisis </strong></p>
<p>Many volumes could be written about the super-crisis of 1929-33 and the Great Depression. Among the subjects that would have to be dealt with would be the nature of European fascism and Roosevelt&#8217;s New Deal in the United States. I obviously cannot do this in these posts. I will simply highlight the most important economic events of the 1930s with special emphasis on the United States, the leading capitalist—and imperialist—country.</p>
<p>Of all the major capitalist nations, the United States was hardest hit by the super-crisis. Why was this? Before attempting to answer, how do I measure the relative severity of the super-crisis in individual capitalist countries?</p>
<p>The relative severity can be measured by the level of industrial production in 1932—the global trough of the economic cycle—as a percentage of the industrial production of 1929, which represented the peak of the 1920-1929 international industrial cycle.</p>
<p><a href="https://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com/does-capitalist-production-have-a-long-cycle/does-capitalist-production-have-a-long-cycle-pt-8/">Read more &#8230;</a></p>
]]></html></oembed>