<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Critique of Crisis Theory]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[critiqueofcrisistheory]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com/author/critiqueofcrisistheory/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Announcement Regarding Future Posts — Topics and&nbsp;Schedule]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>The series of posts that I began in January is now complete. Readers have submitted comments on a number of these. Because of the pressure of adhering to the weekly schedule I set for myself, I have not been able as yet to respond to many of the good questions raised and suggestions made in these comments.</p>
<p>Beginning with my next post, scheduled for Sunday after next (December 20, 2009), and continuing on a biweekly schedule, I will be focusing on comments submitted by readers of this blog.</p>
<p>The first of this new series will be a post on the Austrian School of bourgeois economics, suggested in a reader&#8217;s comment on <a href="https://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com/does-capitalist-production-have-a-long-cycle/does-capitalist-production-have-a-long-cycle-pt-2/">this post</a>.</p>
<p>I encourage readers to submit more comments to enable a clarifying exchange on Marxist economic theory, the current economic crisis and the future of capitalism.</p>
<p>Sam Williams</p>
]]></html></oembed>