<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Cross Stitch Quest]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://crossstitchquest.net]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Sanorace]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://crossstitchquest.net/author/sanorace/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Tiny Watermelon Speedpaint&nbsp;Video]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' width='640' height='360' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/aSMKN4d52Wo?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;' sandbox='allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation'></iframe></span></p>
<p>You can find the finished pattern for this video here: <a href="http://crossstitchquest.net/2020/07/29/free-tiny-watermelon-cross-stitch-pattern/">Watermelon</a></p>
<p>In this one, I designed the whole pattern in PCStitch instead of making a sprite and importing it. I don&#8217;t often use PCStitch from scratch since other programs have more robust drawing tools, but in this case half the stitches were special stitches and the full stitches by themselves wouldn&#8217;t look anything like the finished piece.</p>
<p>Originally I didn&#8217;t like working this way since it requires me to be super precise without a reference image, but now that have more practice with the tools, I think it&#8217;s not as bad as I had thought. I also found this program that lets you change the opacity of a window so now I can have a reference image behind PCStitch which is a huge help. It&#8217;s called <a href="https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/ghost_it.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ghost-It </a>but it&#8217;s kind of old and I&#8217;m worried it might not work forever. If any of you know of a newer program that does the same thing, comment on the video and I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of hard to describe my decision process here. I didn&#8217;t really have a plan going in. I was just playing with shapes and trying to get the angles to work in a way that makes it readable at this small scale.</p>
<p>Readability is one of those things that I constantly worry about when designing patterns. How recognizable is this mass of stitches as a watermelon? Would adding more detail help or would it just make it worse? What parts of watermelons are the most important for people to be able to recognize it as a watermelon?</p>
<p>I guess these questions aren&#8217;t nearly as pressing when dealing with something like a watermelon which is pretty distinct, but they&#8217;re more important when the subject is similar to other things, like a specific breed of dog or species of flower.</p>
<p>This is especially difficult with people. I&#8217;ve been doing a few realistic human projects over on Fiverr and oh it is so much harder to make a human recognizable in a small scale. I&#8217;ve had to say no to certain portraits of some celebrities just because they would end up looking so generic, a regular dude with regular hair and a normal expression won&#8217;t be recognizable as Chandler from Friends with only a 50&#215;50 grid and just full stitches.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m starting to understand caricature artists in a really roundabout way.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://crossstitchquest.files.wordpress.com/2020/07/watermelon-tiny-preview-copy.png?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[419]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>