<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Software is Crap]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://davmac.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[davmac]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://davmac.wordpress.com/author/davmac/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Alternative Mac?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Recently I wrote a post about Apple&#8217;s EULA for various of their software products requiring that the software only be installed and run on Apple-manufactured hardware. Just recently, a company called Psystar Corporation (yeah, I don&#8217;t know how to pronounce it either) made <a href="http://www.psystar.com/openmac_the_apple_alternative.html">an interesting announcement</a>: they are producing Mac-compatible PCs which can run OS X. Not only that, but they&#8217;re willing to sell you OS X Leopard pre-installed on the machines.</p>
<p>I wonder what Apple&#8217;s response to this will be. Apple are fairly litigous and I will think they will probably try for an injunction if they think they have any chance of succeeding. Of course, they might decide they don&#8217;t. I&#8217;ve already said that I think the terms of the EULA are anti-competitive and should be illegal; now, we might find out what the courts think (or at least, whether Apple believes its own terms are enforcable. If it doesn&#8217;t, that certainly leads to the question of why they inclue these terms in the first place&#8230;).</p>
<p><em>Edit 17/04/08</em>: You might want to be careful before you give this company any money. See <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/19643/Suspicions_Soar_About_Mac_Clone_Maker_PsyStar">what OSNews says</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>