<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[EUROPA BOULEVARD]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://europaboulevard.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[europaboulevard]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://europaboulevard.wordpress.com/author/europaboulevard/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[MUNDIVIDÊNCIAS: TURQUIA, EM NOME DA&nbsp;ESTABILIDADE]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Seen from Turkey, the readiness of some EU members to rethink the accession process as it goes along is insulting. In 2005, all EU members backed the opening of accession talks. France’s change of tack under Mr Sarkozy particularly rankles and has led to a backlash against French commercial interests in Turkey. In some respects, Turkey’s revolutionary republic modelled itself on France: the Turks, like the French, believe in the strict separation of state and church (or mosque).&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>John Thornhill</strong>, do <strong>Financial Times</strong> («<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bccb2874-1483-11dd-a741-0000779fd2ac.html" target="_blank">The danger in dashing Turkey’s European dream</a>»), acredita que as justificações usadas para tentar impedir a entrada da Turquia na União Europeia não têm fundamento. Este jornalista entende que, independentemente do caminho que falta trilhar, a Turquia deve permanecer nos horizontes europeus. Sobretudo, em nome da estabilidade.</p>
<p>Para consultar outros órgãos de comunicação social, clique <a href="https://europaboulevard.wordpress.com/media/" target="_blank">aqui</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>