<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[annejjacobson]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/jp12/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Aging and the female&nbsp;philosopher]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://science-professor.blogspot.com/2007/10/qualified-femalesdeja-vu.html">FemaleScienceProfessor</a> observes today</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; it still amazes me that any man in the physical sciences today can seriously ask the “what if there are no qualified women” question as if it is a sane question. </p></blockquote>
<p>Her post starts off with the story of a conference which had to have at least one woman speaker and did meet that very minimal requirement.</p>
<p>One could be excused for thinking that the only thing worse than being a women in a male dominated field, such as philosophy, engineering, the sciences and math tend to be, is to be an aging woman in one of those fields. As one&#8217;s social-sexual value diminishes, the fact that one is thought to have little or no intellectual value becomes all the more evident.</p>
<p>And everyone knows that one&#8217;s abilities are on the decline after 40 or 50, right? Maybe not.</p>
<p>Margaret Mead said, &#8220;There is no more creative force in the world than a menopausal woman with zest.&#8221;  A &#8216;health article&#8217; in the NY Times puts the point in today&#8217;s idiom. Its title: <a href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/evolutions-secret-weapon-grandma/?em&amp;ex=1192161600&amp;en=9755b156089b8519&amp;ei=5087%0A">Evolution’s Secret Weapon: Grandma.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Studies of modern hunter-gatherers in Tanzania, Venezuela and Eastern Paraguay — societies that offer insights into how humans evolved — consistently show that Grandma is doing much of the work. &#8230; Often, the scientists find, women in their 60s are as strong as women in their 20s. “It’s the women over 40 who are carrying the heavy loads,’’ said Dr. Hawkes.</p></blockquote>
<p>If one looks at how much of academic and business life is shaped by expectations built on men&#8217;s lives, the differences in aging may reveal an overlooked way in which the talent and potential contributions of women are squandered. </p>
<p>The article is drawing on research by Kristen Hawkes, an anthropologist at the University of Utah. The results of her work have been in the public domain for some time. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/specials/women/warchive/970916_2115.html">As Natalie Angier noted in 1997</a></p>
<blockquote><p>As Dr. Kristen Hawkes of the University of Utah and her colleagues have found in their extensive studies of the Hadza, women in their 50&#8217;s, 60&#8217;s, 70&#8217;s and beyond are among the most industrious members of the group. They are out in the woods for seven or eight hours a day, gathering more food than virtually any of their comrades.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>