<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jender]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/jenderjender/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Forbidden Words and Double&nbsp;Standards]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just learned, via <a href="http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/10/30/moist-damp-gooey-and-banned-on-television/">Pandagon</a>, that you can&#8217;t use the word &#8216;vagina&#8217; on US television, but &#8216;penis&#8217; is completely hunky-dory.</p>
<blockquote><p>“I had written an episode during the second season of ‘Grey’s’ in which we used the word vagina a great many times (perhaps 11),” Ms. Rhimes wrote in an e-mail message. “Now, we’d once used the word penis 17 times in a single episode and no one blinked. But with vagina, the good folks at broadcast standards and practices blinked over and over and over. I think no one is comfortable experiencing the female anatomy out loud — which is a shame considering our anatomy is half the population.”  </p></blockquote>
<p>She ended up coining the hot new euphemism &#8216;vajayjay&#8217;.  The whole thing is a very nice illustration of the way in which things relating to female sexuality are considered dirty in a way that things related to male sexuality aren&#8217;t.  It can be hard to get students to see this, and this sort of example can really drive it home. </p>
<p>Update:  It seems the above is overstated.  It was the network which blocked the use of &#8216;vagina&#8217; in the episode where &#8216;vajayjay&#8217; was substituted.  They don&#8217;t block all uses of &#8216;vagina&#8217; but according to the writer they have a much higher tolerance for &#8216;penis&#8217; than for &#8216;vagina&#8217;.  So there is a double-standard, but not as stark a double-standard as I initially thought.   Thanks, Cara, for pointing this out.   </p>
]]></html></oembed>