<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[annejjacobson]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/jp12/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The apriori?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Well, not really apriori.  What it is really is blatantly obvious common sense. </p>
<p>Guess what?  Abstinence-only sex education programs don&#8217;t work.  Well, duh! </p>
<p>And they actually cause social problems.  Increase in pregnancies, diseases spread.  Again, duh! </p>
<p>These completely obvious facts are actually supported by research.  But, even though President Bush has vetoed Congress&#8217;s main social spending bill, he wants millions  more for his abstinence-only sex education program.  And the Democrat Senate leader,Pelosi,  may support Bush&#8217;s increase.  (See today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/opinion/02sun3.html?ref=opinion">NY Times </a> editorial.) </p>
<p>In the meantime, perhaps some of us on the &#8216;other&#8217; side of the pond should think of applying to NIH to set up an apriori review of politically inspired ideas. </p>
]]></html></oembed>