<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Monkey]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/monkeypooshoes/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[British Fashion Council makes more&nbsp;suggestions]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Nothing is guaranteed to make one feel more like a heaving mound of flab and blocked pores than the images of &#8216;perfect&#8217; feminine beauty bandied around by the fashion industry. Not only are models  taller than average, thinner than average, and richer than average &#8211; which makes <a href="http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/beauty/article3029451.ece">the £850</a> worth of &#8216;required&#8217; monthly beauty treatments rather easier to afford &#8211; their already non-standard images are routinely photoshopped by magazines to make them taller, thinner, glossier-of-hair, flatter-of-stomach, and bigger-of-boob.  Hope of some kind is on the horizon, however, as the British Fashion Council has just noticed that models&#8217; photos are being regularly airbrushed, and asked everyone nicely to stop. (Quite how it has missed this practice for so long is more of a mystery.)  Let&#8217;s hope someone takes some notice.  Don&#8217;t hold your breath though &#8211; the BFC&#8217;s recent recommendations on not using ultra-skinny models, only employing those over the age of sixteen, and ensuring that their working environment was smoke and drug-free have not been greeted with much enthusiasm by the fashion industry.</p>
]]></html></oembed>